The apology is an important reminder that the traditional role of journalism has been “an independent monitor of power,” not a mouthpiece for power. But in any case, the authorities' communication to the population in no way deserves the term 'super.'” An Independent Monitor of Power Whether it's the vaccines, the hospitals, or a mixture of it all, is every man's bid. IN OTHER WORDS, there is something here that does not deserve the term 'super'. "Even children have been vaccinated on a huge scale, which has not been done in our neighboring countries. “Nevertheless, these super-hospitals are apparently maximally pressured, even though almost the entire population is armed with a super-weapon." And our hospitals are called 'super hospitals,'" he wrote. “The vaccines are consistently referred to as our 'superweapon'. Journalists should have avoided adopting the state’s rhetoric and narrative on vaccination and Denmark’s hospitals, particularly the superlatives that accompanied them, Weichardt stated. One of the largest newspapers in Denmark is apologizing for its journalistic failure during COVID-19 by only publishing official government messages without questioning them. The figures for how many are sick and died of corona should, for obvious reasons, have been published long ago…” OF COURSE, it is first and foremost the authorities who are responsible for informing the population correctly, accurately and honestly. Exactly, the official hospitalization numbers have been shown to be 27 percent higher than the actual figure for how many there are in the hospital, simply because they have corona. “WE HAVE NOT been vigilant enough at the garden gate when the authorities were required to answer what it actually meant that people are hospitalized with corona and not because of corona. In the mea culpa, which went viral on Twitter earlier this month, Weichardt suggested the newspaper should have asked more questions about how public health officials were tabulating data: That is why we - the press - must also take stock of our own efforts. “THE CONSTANT mental alertness has worn out tremendously on all of us. “For ALMOST two years, we - the press and the population - have been almost hypnotically preoccupied with the authorities' daily coronatal,” wrote Bladet journalist Brian Weichardt. The Ekstra Bladet, founded in 1904, said it should have done more due diligence in examining the government’s data and conclusions before reporting them: Only major news stories like the Derek Chauvin murder trial, the chaotic Afghanistan troop pullout, or significant COVID-19 updates could take Wallace away from her preferred story of the day.A Danish newspaper has apologized to its readers for not questioning the government’s data and narratives more throughout the first two years of the pandemic. “In all but five weeks this year, Wallace’s show led off at least one program with references to or direct news about the Jan. “The word ‘insurrection’ was said on ‘Deadline: White House’ 2,260 times, an average of nine times per show, according to Grabien, while ‘January 6th’ was mentioned 2,852 times, including more than 800 times in November and December combined,” the report continued. ET and features a mixture of reporters and left-leaning pundits.” As for Biden, his name was mentioned just 4,710 times, nearly 2.5 times less often on Wallace’s program, which airs weekdays from 4-6 p.m. The COVID cultist host, Nicolle Wallace, has finally moved on from her obsession to Russiagate - but is now obsessed with the Capitol protest instead.įox News reports “a Grabien transcript search found the word ‘Trump’ was uttered on the show 11,668 times from Jan. Donald Trump was discussed 2.5 times more often than Joe Biden on MSNBC’s “ Deadline: White House” in 2021.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |